The etiology of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is complex and multifaceted, involving a combination of biological, psychological, and social factors. Recent theories suggest that children with ODD may have deficits in specific cognitive and emotional skills that contribute to their oppositional behaviors. These deficits can include problems with executive functions such as working memory, task switching, and organized problem solving, as well as difficulties in emotional regulation, such as affective modulation. These skill deficits make it challenging for children to comply with adult demands, leading to what might appear as noncompliance or explosive behavior in response to seemingly normal requests. One study suggests that children with ODD have lower gray volume matter in the cerebellum, especially in areas of the brain involved in executive function. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38795021/
There is no single known gene responsible for ODD, but several single nucleotide polymorphisms have been shown to be associated with increased risk for ODD, see sections on MAOA and 5-HTTLPR (SLC6A4) below.
Parenting and the quality of parent-child relationships play a critical role in either exacerbating or mitigating these behaviors. The transactional model of ODD emphasizes the dynamic interactions between children and their parents. It suggests that the behavior of children with ODD and the reactions from their parents are interconnected and influence each other. For example, a parent’s response to a child’s noncompliance can either escalate or help manage the situation. If a parent reacts harshly or with frustration, it may worsen the child’s oppositional behavior. Conversely, parenting styles that are supportive and use positive reinforcement can help improve compliance and teach the child more effective emotional and behavioral regulation.
Research supports that consistent, predictable, and positive parenting practices are crucial in managing ODD. Strategies that involve clear communication of expectations, consistent consequences for misbehavior, and positive interactions when the child behaves appropriately can reinforce desired behaviors and reduce oppositional episodes. Moreover, teaching parents to anticipate potentially difficult situations (like bath time or dinner time as mentioned in the paragraph) and to plan strategies to handle these situations can prevent many behavioral episodes.
In addition to direct parent-child interactions, broader family dynamics and stressors also influence the manifestation of ODD. High levels of family conflict, stress, and instability can contribute to behavioral issues in children. On the other hand, a stable and supportive family environment can serve as a protective factor against the development of more severe behavioral problems.
Overall, understanding and addressing the specific skill deficits in children with ODD, alongside fostering supportive and structured parenting and family environments, are crucial for effective management and intervention in oppositional defiant disorder.
“Recent theories conceptualize children with oppositional defiant disorder as possessing deficits in a discrete skill set that lead to oppositional behavior.6 An apparently noncompliant child who “explodes” in response to a parental demand may lack the cognitive or emotional skills required to comply with the adult’s request. For example, a child may not have developed the skill of affective modulation, and tends to emotionally overreact, losing his or her capacity to reason. A child may possess deficits in his or her executive cognitive skills (e.g., working memory, ability to change tasks, organized problem solving). These deficits undermine the child’s ability to comply with adult demands. Such skill deficits are components of the transactional conceptualization of oppositional defiant disorder, which emphasizes the interaction of the children and parents, and the context of the behavior. An important feature of this model is the relative predictability of the context (e.g., bath time, dinnertime) and the parent and child behaviors that precipitate a child’s meltdown.” – AAFP https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2008/1001/p861.html
Persistent, ongoing symptoms that last at least 6 months, and are excessive compared with what is usual for the child’s age.
Has your child in the past three months been spiteful or vindictive, or blamed others for his or her own mistakes? (Any “yes” is a positive response.) |
How often is your child touchy or easily annoyed, and how often has your child lost his or her temper, argued with adults, or defied or refused adults’ requests? (Two or more times weekly is a positive response.) |
How often has your child been angry and resentful or deliberately annoying to others? (Four or more times weekly is a positive response.) |
In my opinion as a naturopathic doctor, though these questions lead to a diagnosis of ODD, they do NOT rule out other conditions.
At least four symptoms from the list below should have been present on most days for at least 6 months demonstrating a pattern of angry or irritable mood, argumentative or defiant behavior, or vindictiveness:
There should be evidence of impairment either in the form of distress (in the individual, family, peers, etc.) and/or negative impact on social, educational, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. The behaviors do not occur exclusively during substance use, psychotic, depressive, or bipolar disorder. The patients must not meet the criteria for disruptive mood dysregulation disorder.
Severity: ODD is considered mild if symptoms are confined to only one setting, moderate if at least two settings and severe if symptoms are present in three or more settings.
A repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior in which the basic rights of others or major age-appropriate societal norms or rules are violated, as manifested by the presence of at least three of the following 15 criteria in the past 12 months from any of the categories below, with at least one criterion present in the past 6 months:
Aggression to People and Animals
Destruction of property
Deceitfulness or Theft
Serious violations of rules
B. the disturbance in behavior causing clinically significant impairment in social, academic or occupational functioning
C. If the individual is age 18 years or older, criteria are not met for antisocial personality disorder.
Specify whether:
Childhood-onset type: individuals show at least one symptom characteristic of conduct disorder prior to age 10 years
Adolescent-onset type: individuals show no symptom characteristics of conduct disorder prior to age 10 years
Unspecific onset: criteria for diagnosis of conduct disorder are met, but there is not enough information available to determine whether the onset of first symptom was before or after age 10.
Specify if:
With limited prosocial emotions:
Reference: American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Risk factors for developing ODD include:
Oppositional Defiant Disorder | Conduct Disorder |
Temperamental: problems in emotional regulation (e.g., high levels of emotional reactivity, poor frustration tolerance)Environmental: harsh, inconsistent, or neglectful child-rearing practicesGenetic and physiological: a number of neurobiological markers (e.g., lower heart rate and skin conductance reactivity; reduced basal cortisol reactivity; abnormalities in prefrontal cortex and amygdala) have been associated with oppositional defiant disorder. However, the vast majority of studies have not separated children with oppositional defiant disorder from those with conduct disorder. Thus, it is unclear whether there are markers specific to oppositional defiant disorder. | Temperamental: difficult undercontrolled infant temperament and lower-than-average intelligence, particularly with regard to verbal IQFamily-level environmental: parental rejection and neglect, inconsistent child-rearing practices, harsh discipline, physical or sexual abuse, lack of supervision, early institutional living, frequent changes of caregivers, large family size, parental criminality, and certain kinds of familial psychopathology (e.g., substance-related disorders)Community-level environmental: peer rejection, association with a delinquent peer group, neighborhood exposure to violenceGenetic: biological or adoptive parent or a sibling with conduct disorder, biological parents with severe alcohol use disorder, depressive and bipolar disorders, or schizophrenia or biological parents with history of ADHD or conduct disorder.Physiologic: slower resting heart rate, reduced autonomic fear conditioning (particularly low skin conductance), structural and functional differences in brain areas associated with affect regulation and affect processing, particularly frontotemporal-limbic connections involving the brain’s ventral prefrontal cortex and amygdala.Course modifiers: persistence is more likely for individuals with behaviors that meet criteria for the childhood-onset subtype and qualify for the specifier “with limited prosocial emotions.” the risk that conduct disorders will persist is also increased by co-occurring ADHD and by substance abuse |
Reference: American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) tends to be more prevalent and severe in boys compared to girls. This may be due to the interplay of testosterone and other hormones. Testosterone, the primary male sex hormone, is linked to aggressive behavior. Higher levels of testosterone in boys can contribute to increased aggression and defiant behaviors. Studies have shown that testosterone can influence brain areas related to aggression and social dominance.
Similarly, testosterone may also impact social bonding and empathy. High levels of testosterone can decrease sensitivity to social cues and reduce prosocial behaviors, making it harder for boys with ODD to form positive social bonds. This is often due to the interplay of testosterone, vasopressin and oxytocin.
Vasopressin, a hormone involved in water retention by the kidneys, also plays a crucial role in social behaviors, particularly in males. It promotes protective and territorial behaviors, contributing to social recognition and the formation of social bonds, especially paternal behaviors and mate guarding. On the other hand, oxytocin, often referred to as the “love hormone,” is critical for social bonding, sexual reproduction, and maternal behaviors. It fosters nurturing, trust, and social attachment, making it essential in forming maternal bonds and social connections. The interaction between these hormones is complex, with testosterone modulating the effects of oxytocin and vasopressin. High testosterone levels can dampen the bonding effects of oxytocin while enhancing the aggressive and protective effects of vasopressin. This interplay significantly impacts social behaviors, influencing how individuals bond and nurture one another. For example, oxytocin promotes nurturing and attachment behaviors, whereas vasopressin is more associated with protective and territorial behaviors, particularly in males.
Higher testosterone levels in males contribute to increased aggression and oppositional behaviors, which are hallmark features of ODD. Additionally, the role of vasopressin in promoting aggression and protective behaviors may further explain the higher prevalence of ODD in males. Lower oxytocin levels or reduced sensitivity to its effects might result in less nurturing and cooperative behaviors, potentially leading to more oppositional behaviors.
It should also be noted that some studies suggest that boys are more likely to externalize their stress through behaviors such as aggression and defiance, while girls may internalize stress, leading to anxiety and depression. The interaction between testosterone and social environment is crucial. Boys with higher levels of testosterone might be more sensitive to environmental triggers and stressors, which can lead to an increased risk of developing ODD when coupled with adverse social conditions such as inconsistent discipline, exposure to violence, or lack of positive role models.
Diagnosing Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) typically involves a combination of clinical interviews, behavioral assessments, and gathering information from multiple sources such as parents, teachers, and other caregivers. While primary care providers can initiate the diagnostic process for ODD, typically mental health professionals provide the final diagnosis. Here’s a breakdown of how ODD can be assessed in both primary care and specialized settings:
In some cases, primary care providers may refer a child to a specialist such as a child psychologist, psychiatrist, or neuropsychologist for further assessment. This is especially likely if:
Screening tools:
Pathological Demand Avoidance (PDA) is a proposed sub-type of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) characterized by an extreme avoidance of everyday demands and an anxiety-driven need to control situations. It is not officially recognized in all diagnostic manuals, such as the DSM-5, but it is gaining recognition, particularly in the UK, where it was first described. The concept of PDA helps explain the behaviors of some individuals on the autism spectrum who do not respond well to traditional approaches used for autism. The most essential part of PDA to acknowledge is that every-day demands cause a crippling anxiety for the patient, leading to resistance.
In my opinion, treating patients with parenting techniques to help Pathological Demand Avoidance is highly effective, even if the patient does not meet criteria for PDA or ASD.
Pediatric patients with sleep apnea often exhibit symptoms that can overlap with those of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Sleep apnea in children can lead to significant behavioral issues due to poor sleep quality and resultant daytime sleepiness. Some of the symptoms include:
Pediatric patients with reactive hypoglycemia may present with symptoms that overlap with those of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Reactive hypoglycemia, characterized by low blood sugar levels following a meal, can lead to a range of behavioral and emotional symptoms due to fluctuations in glucose levels. Some of the symptoms include:
The MAOA enzyme (monoamine oxidase A) is known for its role in breaking down neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine in the brain. Variations in this gene, particularly the low-activity variants (sometimes referred to as MAOA-L or low MAOA activity), have been studied for their potential link to behaviors such as increased aggression or risk of psychiatric disorders under certain environmental conditions.
The MAOA-uVNTR (monoamine oxidase A-variable number of tandem repeats) polymorphism refers to a variation in the genetic sequence in the promoter region of the MAOA gene. This gene encodes an enzyme, monoamine oxidase A, which is critical for the metabolism of key neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. These neurotransmitters play significant roles in regulating mood, aggression, and emotional responses.
The MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism involves variations in the number of tandem repeats in the MAOA gene’s promoter region. These repeats can affect how much MAOA enzyme is produced. Typically, the polymorphism is classified into two main types based on the activity level of the enzyme:
Research has explored the link between low-activity MAOA variants and behavioral issues, including aggression, impulsivity, and disorders like ODD. The proposed connection is that lower MAOA activity may lead to higher levels of neurotransmitters associated with aggressive and impulsive behavior, potentially contributing to the symptoms of ODD. However, it’s crucial to emphasize that genetic factors like the MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism interact with environmental factors (e.g., childhood trauma, family dynamics) to influence behavior. This interaction is often referred to as the gene-environment interaction.
The proposed mechanism by which the MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism might influence behavior, particularly in the context of ODD, includes:
MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism severity is worse in males for several reasons. First, the MAOA gene is located on the X chromosome. Since males have only one X chromosome (XY) and females have two (XX), any genetic variation in the MAOA gene has a more direct effect in males. In females, the presence of a second X chromosome can provide a compensatory effect if the variant on one chromosome is less functional. Secondly, testosterone, which is higher in males, has been found to interact with MAOA gene expression. Higher testosterone levels combined with low MAOA activity might exacerbate tendencies towards aggression. Testosterone can modulate brain chemistry and behavior, often enhancing aggression, which might explain the increased severity of symptoms in males.
On the other hand, females benefit from the protective effects of estrogen and progesterone. Progesterone can be metabolized into neuroactive steroids, such as allopregnanolone, which influence brain function and mood. These metabolites can modulate neurotransmitter systems indirectly affecting the neuronal environment and potentially the expression of genes like MAOA. Estrogen can directly influence gene expression through estrogen receptors that interact with DNA. Specifically, estrogen has been shown to increase the transcription of the MAOA gene. This involves the binding of estrogen receptors to specific promoter regions of the MAOA gene, enhancing its expression.
5-HTTLPR is a genetic variant of the serotonin transporter gene (known scientifically as SLC6A4). This variant affects how serotonin is transported in the brain. Serotonin (5-HT) plays a vital role as a neurotransmitter, influencing various behaviors including appetite, movement, aggression, and focus. Research has shown that impaired serotonin function can lead to significant issues, such as enhanced pain perception, anxiety, aggression, symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and impulsivity, which are often observed in cases of substance abuse, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and personality disorders. Previous research has linked impulsive aggression, antisocial behaviors, and other types of disinhibited behavior to a malfunctioning serotonin system in the brain. Additionally, studies have identified a clear correlation between impulsive aggression and reduced serotonin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid. It has been suggested that ODD may also be linked to serotonin system dysfunctions. 5-HTTLPR is also suggested to be associated with increased risk for alcohol abuse, neurotic personality disorders, panic disorders, and depressive symptoms.
The 5-HTTLPR variant consists of a short (s) and a long (l) allele, based on the number of repeats in the gene’s promoter region. The short allele typically leads to less efficient serotonin transport, which may influence brain function and, subsequently, behavior and mood.
The relationship between 5-HTTLPR and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) has been explored in various studies, focusing on how genetic predispositions might interact with environmental factors (like stress or parenting) to influence the development of ODD. Some research suggests that individuals carrying the short allele of the 5-HTTLPR may be more susceptible to developing behavioral issues, including ODD, especially when exposed to adverse environments.
Currently the research shows interaction between 5-HTTLPR, MAOA uVNTR and various social stressors. For example, Teenage delinquency is associated with the combination of 5-HTTLPR x MAOA uVNTR x family conflicts, OR sexual abuse. However, research shows that positive child-parent relationships confers protective benefits, and those patients have the lowest delinquency scores. Note that research is not conclusive, and one study actually found that the long allele was associated with higher risks. Most studies, however, show that the long allele confers greater resilience to stress and depression.
Here’s what typically should be included in the physical exam and what signs a physician would look for to rule out comorbidities or other potential causes:
Here are some evidence-based laboratory tests and other recommended screenings:
Studies show that anemia, iron deficiency and B12 deficiency are linked to “externalizing behaviors:” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29897579/
Studies show that vitamin D deficiency in middle childhood is associated with behavior problems in adolescence. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31429909/
Studies show an inverse relationship between magnesium and zinc levels and behavior problems in children. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38388752/
To assess how well a parent is connecting with a defiant child, a clinician or primary care provider can ask a series of questions that explore the parent’s understanding, empathy, and communication strategies with their child. These questions can help identify areas where the parent might need additional support or guidance.
Here are some example questions. Note that I do not typically ask ALL of these questions. It is important to ask about specific examples of recent situations where the child was defiant. It is also important to ask support and self-care questions, as well as examples of recent positive encounters with their child. Encouraging parents/caregivers in what IS working is very helpful and raises their parenting confidence.
General questions:
Understanding and Empathy:
Communication Strategies
Consistency and Structure
Support and Self-Care (***Always ask these questions! Having a defiant child seriously affects the mental health of the caregiver.***)
Positive Interactions
Behavioral Management
Reflective and Insightful Questions
Parenting strategies are evidence-based and have been shown to significantly improve ODD symptoms.
This pamphlet from American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry can be very helpful for parents:
https://www.aacap.org/App_Themes/AACAP/docs/resource_centers/odd/odd_resource_center_odd_guide.pdf
I also strongly recommend TBRI, which is an attachment-based, trauma-informed intervention. It is best for children with toxic stress, traumas, or children who have experienced adversity.
I highly recommend all naturopathic & integrative medicine pediatric providers get training in PFR. Promoting First Relationships (PFR) is an evidence-based program designed to enhance the relationship between caregivers and young children. “Nurturing parents & caregivers to nurture their young children.” The program focuses on strengthening the caregiver’s ability to read and respond to a child’s cues in a sensitive and nurturing manner.
See “Pathological Demand Avoidance Treatment Plan” link in the documents section.
These handouts from PDA society is helpful: For teachers: https://www.pdasociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/PDA-for-teaching-professionals.pdf
For parents:
Demand-Anxiety Cycle PDF in documents section
See the “MAOA Treatment Plan” link in the documents section.
See the “Balancing your child’s blood sugar” parent handout in the documents section.
Balancing blood sugar is crucial in managing childhood behavior problems because blood sugar levels can significantly impact a child’s mood, energy levels, and cognitive function. Fluctuations in blood sugar can lead to irritability, difficulty concentrating, hyperactivity, and mood swings, which can exacerbate behavior problems. I cannot overstate the importance of a blood-sugar balancing diet for children with defiant behaviors. The reasons for this include:
Foods to Include and Avoid:
Include:
Avoid:
Summary: PROTEIN, FIBER, FAT at most meals. No refined carbs or sugary foods without protein, fiber or fat.
Remember “avoid” does not mean that these children can never have refined carbohydrates, crackers, pastries, or candies. As long as there is not a medical reason to 100% eliminate these foods, it is always better to let kids have periodic access. We know that children who have severely restricted diets often end up with inappropriate relationships with food. These children are more likely to develop binge eating disorders. “Avoid” means to limit on a day-to-day basis, and allow periodic unrestricted access. I describe this to patients as follows: “In my house we talk about these foods as ‘party’ foods. ‘Party’ foods are for party days. For example, Christmas, Halloween, birthdays, etc. Go ahead and let your child have unrestricted access on these days. Don’t limit the amount that they have, but instead tell them to listen to their tummies and be done when their tummies tell them they have had enough.”
Okay (but not great) handout on the Mediterranean Diet. See also “How to Balance Your Child’s Blood Sugar” handout. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0032/946049/cardiac-meddiet.pdf
The Feingold Diet is an elimination diet designed to manage hyperactivity and behavioral issues by removing certain artificial additives and naturally occurring substances. Developed by Dr. Benjamin Feingold in the 1970s, this diet primarily excludes artificial colors, artificial flavors, and certain preservatives such as BHA, BHT, and TBHQ. It also eliminates foods containing salicylates, which are naturally occurring compounds found in various fruits, vegetables, and other foods. The Feingold Diet does not currently have any evidence to support its use in Oppositional Defiant Disorder. However, given the comorbidity of ADHD in patients with ODD, it is reasonable to give a Feingold Diet a try. A Feingold Diet also limits preservatives and colorings typically found in highly processed foods. Given that highly processed foods are associated with a number of long-term health consequences, I think it is reasonable to request parents to eliminate these foods.
The Feingold Diet works by eliminating specific additives and chemicals that are believed to affect behavior and cognitive function. The theory is that some children are sensitive to these substances, which can exacerbate symptoms of hyperactivity, inattention, and oppositional behaviors. By removing these potential triggers, the diet aims to reduce behavioral problems and improve overall functioning. Potential benefits of a Feingold Diet for children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder include:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21127082
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28121994
“Artificial food colors (AFCs) have not been established as the main cause of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but accumulated evidence suggests that a subgroup shows significant symptom improvement when consuming an AFC-free diet and reacts with ADHD-type symptoms on challenge with AFCs. Of children with suspected sensitivities, 65% to 89% reacted when challenged with at least 100 mg of AFC. Oligoantigenic diet studies suggested that some children in addition to being sensitive to AFCs are also sensitive to common nonsalicylate foods (milk, chocolate, soy, eggs, wheat, corn, legumes) as well as salicylate-containing grapes, tomatoes, and orange. Some studies found “cosensitivity” to be more the rule than the exception. Recently, 2 large studies demonstrated behavioral sensitivity to AFCs and benzoate in children both with and without ADHD. A trial elimination diet is appropriate for children who have not responded satisfactorily to conventional treatment or whose parents wish to pursue a dietary investigation.”
First, assess the ability of the parent to make major dietary changes. In many cases these parents are overwhelmed already, and adhering to a strict dietary plan for their child may be very challenging. Secondly, assess the child’s willingness to adhere to the diet, and any obstacles that may prevent adherence (e.g., schools giving kids candy as rewards). I typically recommend a 30-day trial elimination diet followed by a challenge portion.
As a part of a Feingold Diet, a low salicylate diet can be recommended in some circumstances. I should also note that I could not find any scientific evidence supporting a low salicylate diet. It should ONLY be continued if a patient is truly sensitive to these foods. High salicylate foods to avoid include:
A gluten-free, dairy-free elimination diet has no direct evidence for use in Oppositional Defiant Disorder. However, increasing evidence suggests that a GF/DF diet may be helpful for patients with autism and ADHD. Note that the evidence is still mixed, and it appears that only a subset of children are sensitive to either gluten or dairy. I would strongly recommend a trial of this diet for kids who have autism AND defiant behaviors, or who have Pathological Demand Avoidance. As always, discuss with the parent the ability of the family to accomplish this diet, including the financial resources, how picky the child is, and the ability of the caregiver to understand and comply with this diet.
The rationale for a GF/DF diet is in reducing gluteomorphins and caseomorphins, which are opioid peptides derived from the incomplete digestion of gluten and casein, respectively. Casein is a protein found in dairy products. These peptides can cross the intestinal barrier and enter the bloodstream, potentially affecting brain function by mimicking the action of opioid peptides and binding to opioid receptors. This interaction can exacerbate neurological effects, leading to increased irritability, reduced attention, heightened anxiety, and other behavioral issues.
A gluten-free, dairy-free diet may also help modify the gastrointestinal microbiome, which has also been implicated in autism. Children with autism and other sensitivities often have increased intestinal permeability, which allows these peptides to enter the bloodstream more easily. This can further amplify their effects on the brain and behavior, contributing to symptoms such as aggression, hyperactivity, and social withdrawal.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11001083/ – Positive study on GF/DF diets for autism spectrum disorder.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12223079/ – discussion of opiates in autism.
(de Magistris et al., 2010; Elder, 2008). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747333/ – high rates of antibodies in autism population.
See studies in the laboratory workup section which link low levels of certain nutrients to increased rates of aggression and behavior issues in children.
The study titled “Nutritional supplementation to reduce child aggression: a randomized, stratified, single-blind, factorial trial” published in J Child Psychol Psychiatry, investigated the effects of omega-3, multivitamins, and minerals combined with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) on childhood aggression. The trial involved 290 children aged 11-12, divided into four groups: Nutrition only, CBT only, Nutrition + CBT, and Control. The children’s aggressive and antisocial behaviors were assessed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment. Results showed that the Nutrition only group exhibited reduced externalizing behavior at 3 months, while the Nutrition + CBT group showed reduced behavior at 6 months. However, these effects were not sustained at 12 months, indicating short-term benefits of the interventions. Note that the nutritional supplement stopped at 3 months. Externalizing behavior = aggression, yelling, delinquency, impulsivity, defiance. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234432/
Note that the authors also performed a similar study which actually showed that supplementing children with omega-3 fatty acids actually reduced intimate partner violence. https://smartfish1.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/reductions-of-intimate-partner-violence-resulting-fromsupplementing-children-with-omega-3-fatty-acids-portnoy-j-2018.pdf
Another study found that a mixed multimineral/multivitamin nutrient supplement improved symptoms in aggression. Over a 16-week open-label trial, participants received a micronutrient mix, which significantly improved parent-reported aggressive and violent behaviors, family functioning, and health-related quality of life. The nutrient mix included alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E), ascorbic acid (vitamin C), biotin, chromium, pyridoxal-5-phosphate (P5P), pyridoxine (vitamins B6), selenium, and zinc, The results indicate that micronutrient therapy is well-tolerated and effective, suggesting the need for further research through a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial to confirm these findings. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28481642/ I think it should be noted that B12 and folate were not included in the nutrient supplement.
See research summary above, Nutritional supplementation to reduce child aggression: a randomized, stratified, single-blind, factorial trial.
A few studies support the use of Omega 3 fatty acids in children with ODD, especially those who also have ADHD:
Research suggests that low zinc levels are associated with aggression in children. One study showed that 10 mg of zinc supplementation did not significantly reduce aggressive behaviors in children. However, the authors note that dietary changes were also occurring in the school at the same time as the trial, which could have affected nutrient intake in both the active and placebo groups. Other trials have mixed data, or do not show a benefit. However, none of the trial selected patients with baseline low zinc levels. I strongly recommend zinc supplementation as a trial for children with aggressive behaviors who also have low zinc levels.
Stimulant medications, primarily prescribed for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), can be beneficial in managing Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) when these conditions co-occur. These medications, including methylphenidate-based options like Ritalin and Concerta, and amphetamine-based options like Adderall and Vyvanse, work by increasing dopamine and norepinephrine levels in the brain. This helps improve attention, focus, and self-control, which can indirectly reduce oppositional and defiant behaviors by addressing the impulsivity and hyperactivity often seen in ADHD.
Though most studies suggest that amphetamines work best in children with co-existing ADHD, one study suggests that extended release amphetamines (adderall XR) improved ODD symptoms even in children without ADHD. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16750455/
Remember that the use of stimulants is often accompanied by side effects like appetite suppression, insomnia, stomachaches, and headaches, and some children may experience increased irritability or anxiety. Regular monitoring and adjustments by a healthcare provider are essential to manage these side effects and ensure the medication’s effectiveness.
Clonidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, is used off-label to treat Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), particularly when comorbid with ADHD. It helps reduce symptoms such as hyperactivity, impulsivity, aggression, and emotional over-reactivity by decreasing norepinephrine release in the brain. Some small studies show improvements in behavior and conduct in children with ODD. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12874489/
Intranasal oxytocin has been suggested as a potential treatment for Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) due to its role in enhancing social bonding and emotional regulation. Oxytocin is a hormone that influences social behaviors, trust, and emotional interactions. A new study indicates that administering oxytocin intranasally can lead to significant improvements in behaviors associated with ODD, such as reducing aggression and increasing prosocial behaviors. This treatment may help children with ODD form better connections with others, increasing empathy and reducing oppositional behaviors. The study suggests that oxytocin’s ability to enhance emotional and social processing could be particularly beneficial in mitigating the challenging behaviors seen in ODD. Treatment was with intranasal oxytocin (24 IU daily, or 12 IU daily if the weight is < 40kg).
Neurofeedback has been explored as a treatment for Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), focusing on altering brainwave patterns to improve behavior. Neurofeedback involves training individuals to modify their brainwave activity, which can help reduce symptoms of ODD such as aggression, defiance, and irritability. Studies suggest that children with ODD often exhibit dysregulated brainwave patterns similar to those seen in ADHD, with an excess of low-frequency brainwaves. Neurofeedback aims to reduce these low-frequency waves and increase mid-range waves, promoting more balanced brain activity.
I would also consider the following supplements and/or treatment considerations in children with ODD: